This is part 4 of 6 in ‘80 Failures, Fractures and Food-Safety Episodes That the Celebration of Indian Food Must Also Own’, an analysis by Avinash Mudaliar.
The Mid-Day Meal System: Noble Intent, Lethal Failures
39. The Chhapra school-meal tragedy exposed a failure in a programme meant to protect children. On 16 July 2013, 23 children died after eating a mid-day meal at a primary school in Gandaman in Bihar’s Saran district. A forensic report identified monocrotophos, an agricultural pesticide, in the cooking oil. The finding made the safety of ingredients at the point of preparation impossible to treat as a minor administrative matter. A programme can reach a classroom every day and still depend on the smallest decisions about how its food is stored and handled.
40. The Chhapra case raised questions of criminal liability and pesticide policy. In 2016, a trial court sentenced the school principal to consecutive terms totalling 17 years, with 10 years for culpable homicide and seven for attempted culpable homicide. India had already restricted monocrotophos use on vegetables at the time, while other uses were permitted. After the deaths, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization called for faster withdrawal of highly hazardous pesticides. The sentence addressed criminal responsibility in that case. The policy question reaches further, into the handling and storage of agricultural chemicals and how they can come into contact with food.
41. Reported food poisoning in school-meal programmes extended far beyond one district. An analysis by The Hindu drew on disease surveillance records and news reports and counted at least 9,646 people affected across 232 incidents from 2009 to 14 September 2022. It recorded 979 affected people in 2022 by that cutoff, the highest figure it had recorded in six years. The analysis is a conservative count of reported events. The purpose of the school-meal programme gives these incidents particular weight. The children receiving the meal rely on the adults who buy, store, cook and serve it.
42. Safety has to hold at the point where the school meal is served. In the same reported dataset, Karnataka accounted for 1,524 affected people, followed by Odisha with 1,327, Telangana with 1,092, Bihar with 950 and Andhra Pradesh with 794. About 12% of the people affected in the analysis had eaten meals in which an animal or insect was reported. The counts reflect the people recorded, with programme size and reporting coverage varying by state. The 2021 approval of PM POSHAN envisaged coverage of 11.8 crore children. National guidelines require the cooked meal to be tasted by adults, including a teacher, before service. At this scale, the everyday application of that safeguard matters as much as the rule itself.
Corporate and Tech Food-Sector Failures
43. The McDonald’s fries case made ingredient disclosure a question of trust. In 2002, McDonald’s agreed to a US settlement involving $10 million in donations to Hindu, vegetarian and other groups after litigation over beef-derived flavouring in fries and hash browns. The dispute concerned flavouring in the US products, even though they were prepared using vegetable oil. It prompted protests in India, where McDonald’s India said its products contained no beef extract. The episode shows why an ingredient that seems minor to a manufacturer can be decisive for a person buying food according to religious or ethical commitments.
44. Swiggy’s pandemic layoffs exposed the vulnerability of employees in platform food businesses. On 18 May 2020, Swiggy announced that it would lay off 1,100 employees across cities, functions and its head office. It also said it had begun scaling down cloud-kitchen facilities, with some changes temporary and others permanent. The announced layoffs concerned employees. The experiences of delivery partners require separate evidence. The pandemic forced attention onto the people who make app-based convenience possible, from kitchen and office staff to the riders whose work follows a different employment model.
45. Delivery-only kitchens make it harder for a diner to see where a meal is made. Several online brands can operate out of a shared facility without a storefront. Food businesses still fall under FSSAI licensing or registration rules and the applicable hygiene requirements. What a customer can see on a listing is a separate matter. The national grievance totals cover delivery apps across kitchen types. Knowing which operator and premises prepared an order would make it easier to use those complaints to investigate a specific concern.
46. Quick commerce has a distribution layer that customers rarely see. In August 2026, Maharashtra’s FDA took action at particular Blinkit, Zepto and Swiggy Instamart sites, with inspectors reporting problems including expired stock and poor hygiene. A separate October action included a warehouse operated by Zomato Hyperpure. Warehouses and dark stores raise questions about storage, temperature and stock rotation before an item ever leaves for the customer. A grocery order can reach a doorstep in minutes. Its condition depends on how it was handled for the much longer period before dispatch.
Explore the series
